[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrxcCZKvFYjxLf9n@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:04:57 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
Cc: corbet@....net, rafael@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
pavel@....cz, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
hch@...radead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
keescook@...omium.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
vkuznets@...hat.com, wei.liu@...nel.org, parri.andrea@...il.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
kirill.shutemov@...el.com, andi.kleen@...el.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/ACPI: Set swiotlb area according to the number
of lapic entry in MADT
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:31:50AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
> From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
>
> When initialize swiotlb bounce buffer, smp_init() has not been
> called and cpu number can not be got from num_online_cpus().
> Use the number of lapic entry to set swiotlb area number and
> keep swiotlb area number equal to cpu number on the x86 platform.
Can we reorder that initialization? Because I really hate having
to have an arch hook in every architecture.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists