[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08505fe6-ae2a-0890-ab11-899eb4d74dc5@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:38:07 -0500
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
jirislaby@...nel.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
phil.edworthy@...esas.com, kernel@...il.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "serial: 8250: dw: Move the USR register to
pdata"
Hi,
On 6/29/22 01:08, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 07:02:31PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>> pdata is only setup by DT machines, leaving ACPI machines
>> with null pdata. Since I don't know the exact mapping of
>> ACPI ID's to dw 8250 variations I can't add pdata to them
>> without possibly breaking something. As such the simplest
>> fix here is probably just to revert this commit.
>>
>> This reverts commit ffd381445eac2aa624e49bab5a811451e8351008.
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
>
> Didn't checkpatch complain that you need a blank line before your
> signed-off-by line?
No, it, and I apparently thought that the revert was part of the tagging.
Lets kill this set anyway, as the patch you already have to add pdata to
ACPI in tty-linus solves all these problems. I guess I missed that
posting, so sorry about the noise.
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists