linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] GSC support for XeHP SDV and DG2 platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YrxyY9Vi2Rb7x4PK@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:40:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Cc:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        Vitaly Lubart <vitaly.lubart@...el.com>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] GSC support for XeHP SDV and DG2 platforms

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 02:28:59PM +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
> Add GSC support for XeHP SDV and DG2 platforms.
> 
> The series includes changes for the mei driver:
> - add ability to use polling instead of interrupts
> - add ability to use extended timeouts
> - setup extended operational memory for GSC
> 
> The series includes changes for the i915 driver:
> - allocate extended operational memory for GSC
> - GSC on XeHP SDV offsets and definitions
> 
> Greg KH, please review and ACK the MEI patches.
> (The patch 13 is one that you asked to change in prev version)
> We are pushing these patches through gfx tree as
> the auxiliary device belongs there.

You forgot to review or sign off on any of these, you know better than
that...

Please run this through the Intel patch-review process before resending
this out for non-Intel people to see, so you don't waste our time.

thanks,

greg k-h