linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: 8250_dw: Sort headers alphabetically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yr27viU1mHyp/JmE@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:05:34 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: 8250_dw: Sort headers alphabetically

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:38:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> For the sake of better maintenance, sort included headers alphabetically.

How does that make anything easier to maintain?

> While at it, split the serial group of headers which makes clear the
> subsystem the driver belongs to.

Where did you do that?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> index d5df17455f1d..86762593579f 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> @@ -9,26 +9,27 @@
>   * LCR is written whilst busy.  If it is, then a busy detect interrupt is
>   * raised, the LCR needs to be rewritten and the uart status register read.
>   */
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> -#include <linux/serial_8250.h>
> -#include <linux/serial_reg.h>
> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/property.h>
> -#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> -#include <linux/notifier.h>
> -#include <linux/slab.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
> -#include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/reset.h>
> -#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>  
> +#include <linux/serial_8250.h>
> +#include <linux/serial_reg.h>

Is this the "split"?

Anyway, it's just code churn, I'll apply it...

thanks,

greg k-h