[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yr3FGRhvJbkW8/Px@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:45:29 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
CC: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"jordan@...micpenguin.net" <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"alyssa@...enzweig.io" <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"zhang.lyra@...il.com" <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"yangyingliang@...wei.com" <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
"orsonzhai@...il.com" <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
"gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com" <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"marcan@...can.st" <marcan@...can.st>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolin.wang7@...il.com" <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible
domain and device/group
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 05:33:16PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Wed, 2022-06-29 at 12:47 -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 03:19:43PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 06:35:49PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > It's not used in VFIO context. "return 0" just satisfy the
> > > > > > iommu
> > > > > > framework to go ahead. and yes, here we only allow the shared
> > > > > > "mapping-domain" (All the devices share a domain created
> > > > > > internally).
> > >
> > > What part of the iommu framework is trying to attach a domain and
> > > wants to see success when the domain was not actually attached ?
> > >
> > > > > What prevent this driver from being used in VFIO context?
> > > >
> > > > Nothing prevent this. Just I didn't test.
> > >
> > > This is why it is wrong to return success here.
> >
> > Hi Yong, would you or someone you know be able to confirm whether
> > this "return 0" is still a must or not?
> >
> > Considering that it's an old 32-bit platform for MTK, if it would
> > take time to do so, I'd like to drop the change in MTK driver and
> > note in commit log for you or other MTK folks to change in future.
>
> Yes. Please help drop the change in this file.
>
> Sorry I don't have the board at hand right now and I could not list the
> backtrace where this is needed(should be bus_iommu_probe from the
> previous debug...)
OK. Thanks for the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists