[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e1992f0fabccb07a1994d17cc773895fea92139.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:54:41 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <deller@....de>,
<airlied@...ux.ie>
CC: <msp@...libre.com>, <granquet@...libre.com>,
<jitao.shi@...iatek.com>, <wenst@...omium.org>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 05/10] drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 Embedded DisplayPort
driver
Hi, Bo-Chen:
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 16:03 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
>
> This patch adds a embedded displayport driver for the MediaTek mt8195
> SoC.
>
> It supports the MT8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers
> DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes.
>
> The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device will
> never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a
> register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so
> that
> both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets
> device
> data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be
> used
> to control the phy properties.
>
> This driver is based on an initial version by
> Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
> [Bo-Chen: Cleanup the drivers and modify comments from reviewers]
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +static void mtk_dp_set_color_format(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp,
> + enum dp_pixelformat color_format)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + mtk_dp->info.format = color_format;
Drop this. mtk_dp->info.format is alwasy set out of this function.
> +
> + /* update MISC0 */
> + mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_ENC0_P0_3034,
> + color_format << DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_SHIFT,
> + DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_MASK);
> +
> + switch (color_format) {
> + case DP_PIXELFORMAT_YUV422:
> + val = PIXEL_ENCODE_FORMAT_DP_ENC0_P0_YCBCR422;
> + break;
This driver use only DP_PIXELFORMAT_YUV422 and DP_PIXELFORMAT_RGB, so
keep these two and drop others.
Regards,
CK
> + case DP_PIXELFORMAT_YUV420:
> + val = PIXEL_ENCODE_FORMAT_DP_ENC0_P0_YCBCR420;
> + break;
> + case DP_PIXELFORMAT_RGB:
> + case DP_PIXELFORMAT_YUV444:
> + val = PIXEL_ENCODE_FORMAT_DP_ENC0_P0_RGB;
> + break;
> + case DP_PIXELFORMAT_Y_ONLY:
> + case DP_PIXELFORMAT_RAW:
> + case DP_PIXELFORMAT_RESERVED:
> + default:
> + drm_warn(mtk_dp->drm_dev, "Unsupported color format:
> %d\n",
> + color_format);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + mtk_dp_update_bits(mtk_dp, MTK_DP_ENC0_P0_303C,
> + val, PIXEL_ENCODE_FORMAT_DP_ENC0_P0_MASK);
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists