lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:07:29 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:     "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-man@...r.kernel.org" <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation/x86: Add the AMX enabling example

> But these state components are architectural. While this can help 
> userspace anyway, saying "XSTATE component" here and on the man-page is 
> probably it as they are already defined in the x86 spec.

An application writer can't use:

# include {x86 spec}"

to get these values ... if applications need them to find out if AMX is present,
and to enable it, then they need an API.

Maybe your example code should just be a library routine? So application writers
can just do:

	if (!intel_amx_enable()) {
		error message, or fall back to non-AMX implementation
	}

without having to worry about those #defines.

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ