linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 10/14] arm64: dts: freescale: imx8qxp: Remove unnecessary clock related entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d8b2044-5ca6-c90c-57b4-afbb2ae20dde@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:01:31 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com>
Cc:     "Viorel Suman (OSS)" <viorel.suman@....nxp.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Graute <oliver.graute@...oconnector.com>,
        Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>,
        Mirela Rabulea <mirela.rabulea@....com>,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Ming Qian <ming.qian@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/14] arm64: dts: freescale: imx8qxp: Remove
 unnecessary clock related entries

On 30/06/2022 10:36, Viorel Suman wrote:
> On 22-06-29 20:04:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/06/2022 18:44, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
>>> From: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com>
>>>
>>> "clocks" and "clock-names" are not used the driver, so
>>> remove them in order to match the yaml definition.
>>
>> So this explains the unexpected change in the bindings... but actually
>> it does not explain whether it is correct or not. Just because driver
>> does not use it, is not a proof that clocks are not there. In different
>> OS/implementation this DTS might break stuff, so basically it is ABI
>> break. DTS should describe the hardware fully, so if the clocks are
>> there, should be in DTS regardless of the driver.
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Both XTAL clocks - 24MHz and 32kHz - are still defined in DTSI files, see for instance in
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi :
> ---------------
>         xtal32k: clock-xtal32k {
>                 compatible = "fixed-clock";
>                 #clock-cells = <0>;
>                 clock-frequency = <32768>;
>                 clock-output-names = "xtal_32KHz";
>         };
> 
>         xtal24m: clock-xtal24m {
>                 compatible = "fixed-clock";
>                 #clock-cells = <0>;
>                 clock-frequency = <24000000>;
>                 clock-output-names = "xtal_24MHz";
>         };
> ---------------
> Both can be seen in /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary once boot is complete, both can be referenced
> in any DTS node, so there is no ABI break.

ABI break is not relevant to the fixed clocks being or not being defined
in the DTS. You have a device which was taking the clock inputs, so the
clocks stayed enabled.

Now, you don't take these inputs, so for example the clocks are getting
disabled as not used.

> 
> "DTS should describe the hardware fully" - this is true in case the OS is supposed to controll the
> hardware fully. i.MX8 System Controller Unit concept implies resources being allocated and managed
> by SCU, there is no direct OS access to some hardware. SCU actually defines the hardware environment
> the OS is being able to see and run within. SCU is able to define several such isolated hardware
> environments, each having its own OS running. So, in this particular case - i.MX8 SCU concept -
> DTS should describe the hardware from the perspective of the hardware environment exposed by SCU to
> OS.

OK, that sounds good, but the question about these clocks remain - are
they inputs to the SCU or not.

Regardless whether they are actual input or not, you used not
appropriate argument here - that Linux OS implementation does not use
them. The proper argument is - whether the hardware environment has them
connected or not.

Best regards,
Krzysztof