[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c8a4d70-3ef9-bc1c-51ad-9063fdfb43bc@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:42:53 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>
Cc: "lizhijian@...itsu.com" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: use-after-free in srpt_enable_tpg()
On 6/30/22 09:40, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 6/27/22 11:37 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 6/27/22 00:09, lizhijian@...itsu.com wrote:
>>> So far, I doubt if the previous defect of configfs mentioned in
>>> 9b64f7d0b: "(RDMA/srpt: Postpone HCA removal until after configfs
>>> directory removal)" has got a better solution. if not, i have no a
>>> clear mechanism to avoid it yet.
>>>
>>> feedbacks are very welcome.
>> Mike, are you perhaps aware of any plans to add functions to the LIO core for removing tpg and wwn objects?
>>
>
> I don't know any work being done in this area. I was only working
> on the refcounting/configfs parts for sessions in those configfs/sysfs
> patchsets. However, I think I hit similar issues with the session.
> I went around the world with solutions but didn't really like them
> so I never pushed the patches for inclusion.
>
> What was the hang caused by 9b64f7d0bb0a?
Hi Mike,
I have not been able to find Honggang's bug report that led to the
revert of that commit. I guess that the hang happened in the while-loop
in srpt_release_sport() that was modified by commit 9b64f7d0bb0a.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists