linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/gup: Add FOLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:01:53 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Linux MM Mailing List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/gup: Add FOLL_INTERRUPTIBLE

On 6/30/22 06:49, Peter Xu wrote:
> Looks good to me, I'd tune a bit to make it less ambiguous on a few places:
> 
> 		/*
> 		 * FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE is opt-in. GUP callers must set
> 		 * FOLL_INTERRUPTIBLE to enable FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE.
> 		 * That's because some callers may not be prepared to
> 		 * handle early exits caused by non-fatal signals.
> 		 */
> 
> Would that be okay to you?
> 

Yes, looks good. With that change, please feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>



thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA