linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arch/*/: remove CONFIG_VIRT_TO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c1d245ae-54c3-ec2b-e975-d50f9a863d2b@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 07:21:53 +1200
From:   Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Khalid Aziz <khalid@...ehiking.org>,
        "Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        Matt Wang <wwentao@...are.com>,
        Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net>,
        Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arch/*/: remove CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS

Hi Christoph,

On 29/06/22 18:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 11:09:00AM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> And all SCSI buffers are allocated using kmalloc? No way at all for user
>> space to pass unaligned data?
> Most that you will see actually comes from the page allocator.  But
> the block layer has a dma_alignment limit, and when userspace sends
> I/O that is not properly aligned it will be bounce buffered before
> it it sent to the driver.

That limit is set to L1_CACHE_BYTES on m68k so we're good here.

Thanks,

     Michael