[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXRxvSB9WrcTEM+2rnALuzPBdPz=v+WGhvN_SS2Ba2MTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:59:54 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claire Jensen <cjense@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Skip for paranoid 3
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 2:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 08:40:07PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Add skip tests for paranoid level being 3.
> > Rather than skipping lines starting "Failed", skip lines containing
> > "failed" - making the behavior consistent with the previous python
> > version.
>
> paranoid 3 is an out of tree patch.
Thanks, what is the right way to resolve this? My desktop appears to
be carrying the patch and I'd like the tests to be as green as
possible.
Thanks,
Ian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists