lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:55:19 +0200
From:   Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc:     xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86: fix setup of brk area

On 29.06.22 19:14, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Hi Juergen,
> 
> It helps to actually Cc the person who broke it ;-)
> 
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Commit e32683c6f7d2 ("x86/mm: Fix RESERVE_BRK() for older binutils")
>> put the brk area into the .bss..brk section (placed directly behind
>> .bss),
> 
> Hm? It didn't actually do that.
> 
> For individual translation units, it did rename the section from
> ".brk_reservation" to ".bss..brk".  But then during linking it's still
> placed in .brk in vmlinux, just like before.

Sorry, I misread the patch commit message and was fooled by the fact that
bisection clearly pointed at this patch to have introduced the problem.

I only discovered later that the main issue was the added "NOLOAD"
attribute.

>> causing it not to be cleared initially. As the brk area is used
>> to allocate early page tables, these might contain garbage in not
>> explicitly written entries.
>>
>> This is especially a problem for Xen PV guests, as the hypervisor will
>> validate page tables (check for writable page tables and hypervisor
>> private bits) before accepting them to be used. There have been reports
>> of early crashes of PV guests due to illegal page table contents.
>>
>> Fix that by letting clear_bss() clear the brk area, too.
> 
> While it does make sense to clear the brk area, I don't understand how
> my patch broke this.  How was it getting cleared before?

It seemed to have worked by chance. The Xen hypervisor is clearing all
alloc-only sections when loading a kernel (this will "fix" the dom0
case reliably together with patch 3 of this series).

Grub might do the clearing, too (for the PV domU case), but I haven't
verified that by code inspection.

I'll drop the "Fixes:" tag.


Juergen

Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3099 bytes)

Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ