| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:59:09 +0200
From: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
Cc: linuxfancy@...glegroups.com, linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com,
quentin.schulz@...obroma-systems.com,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] media: ov5693: move hw cfg functions into
ov5693_hwcfg
Hi Jacopo,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 06:07:56PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 05:29:31PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > Move hw configuration functions into ov5693_hwcfg. This is done to
> > separate the code that handle the hw cfg from probe in a clean way.
> > Add also support to get clock from "clock-frequency" fwnode in
> > ov5675_hwcfg function
>
> Why ? :)
>
> What about:
>
> "Add support for ACPI-based platforms that specify the clock frequency by
> using the "clock-frequency" property instead of specifying a clock
> provider reference."
Thanks for suggestion. I use this in v4
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@...rulasolutions.com>
>
> Not on this patch, but it seems you have not collected the tags
> received on the previous version of the series.
>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Fix commit body as suggested by Sakari, Jacopo
> > - Add details to commit body as suggested Jacopo
> > - Move ov5693_check_hwcfg into ov5693_hwcfg
> > - Fix xvclk_rate position as suggested Jacopo
>
> Also fixed a bug it seems :)
You are right :'(
>
> >
> > drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> > index d2adc5513a21..3c805a5a5181 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5693.c
> > @@ -1339,16 +1339,48 @@ static int ov5693_get_regulators(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> > ov5693->supplies);
> > }
> >
> > -static int ov5693_check_hwcfg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> > +static int ov5693_hwcfg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> > {
> > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(ov5693->dev);
> > struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint bus_cfg = {
> > .bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY,
> > };
> > struct fwnode_handle *endpoint;
> > + u32 xvclk_rate;
> > unsigned int i;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + ov5693->xvclk = devm_clk_get_optional(ov5693->dev, "xvclk");
> > + if (IS_ERR(ov5693->xvclk))
> > + return dev_err_probe(ov5693->dev, PTR_ERR(ov5693->xvclk),
> > + "failed to get xvclk: %ld\n",
> > + PTR_ERR(ov5693->xvclk));
> > +
> > + if (ov5693->xvclk) {
> > + xvclk_rate = clk_get_rate(ov5693->xvclk);
> > + } else {
> > + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "clock-frequency",
> > + &xvclk_rate);
> > +
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(ov5693->dev, "can't get clock frequency");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> This now looks good to me, thanks!
>
> > +
> > + if (xvclk_rate != OV5693_XVCLK_FREQ)
> > + dev_warn(ov5693->dev, "Found clk freq %u, expected %u\n",
> > + xvclk_rate, OV5693_XVCLK_FREQ);
> > +
> > + ret = ov5693_configure_gpios(ov5693);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = ov5693_get_regulators(ov5693);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(ov5693->dev, ret,
> > + "Error fetching regulators\n");
> > +
> > endpoint = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, NULL);
> > if (!endpoint)
> > return -EPROBE_DEFER; /* Could be provided by cio2-bridge */
> > @@ -1390,7 +1422,6 @@ static int ov5693_check_hwcfg(struct ov5693_device *ov5693)
> > static int ov5693_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > {
> > struct ov5693_device *ov5693;
> > - u32 xvclk_rate;
> > int ret = 0;
>
> No need for ret to be intialized, but it was already like this...
I can send patch later for this, or you prefer to fix this in this
series?
Regards,
Tommaso
>
> The patch itself looks good
> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>
>
> Thanks
> j
>
> >
> > ov5693 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ov5693), GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -1400,7 +1431,7 @@ static int ov5693_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > ov5693->client = client;
> > ov5693->dev = &client->dev;
> >
> > - ret = ov5693_check_hwcfg(ov5693);
> > + ret = ov5693_hwcfg(ov5693);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1408,26 +1439,6 @@ static int ov5693_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> >
> > v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&ov5693->sd, client, &ov5693_ops);
> >
> > - ov5693->xvclk = devm_clk_get(&client->dev, "xvclk");
> > - if (IS_ERR(ov5693->xvclk)) {
> > - dev_err(&client->dev, "Error getting clock\n");
> > - return PTR_ERR(ov5693->xvclk);
> > - }
> > -
> > - xvclk_rate = clk_get_rate(ov5693->xvclk);
> > - if (xvclk_rate != OV5693_XVCLK_FREQ)
> > - dev_warn(&client->dev, "Found clk freq %u, expected %u\n",
> > - xvclk_rate, OV5693_XVCLK_FREQ);
> > -
> > - ret = ov5693_configure_gpios(ov5693);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - ret = ov5693_get_regulators(ov5693);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> > - "Error fetching regulators\n");
> > -
> > ov5693->sd.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> > ov5693->pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> > ov5693->sd.entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR;
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
--
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
tommaso.merciai@...rulasolutions.com
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@...rulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists