[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d9ed3ac-289f-88ea-ad08-0031e9bde1bb@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 12:17:30 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>, rafael@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
"open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal/drivers/tegra: Remove get_trend function
On 29/06/2022 22:05, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 6/16/22 23:25, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The get_trend function does already what the generic framework does.
>>
>> Remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> ---
[ ... ]
>> static void thermal_irq_enable(struct tegra_thermctl_zone *zn)
>> {
>> u32 r;
>> @@ -716,7 +685,6 @@ static int tegra_thermctl_set_trips(void *data, int lo, int hi)
>> static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tegra_of_thermal_ops = {
>> .get_temp = tegra_thermctl_get_temp,
>> .set_trip_temp = tegra_thermctl_set_trip_temp,
>> - .get_trend = tegra_thermctl_get_trend,
>> .set_trips = tegra_thermctl_set_trips,
>> };
>>
>
> Guenter fixed the LM90 driver problem. There are other regressions in
> the latest -next which complicate testing, but I can't see any problems
> from the thermal side.
>
> Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Great! Thanks for taking the time to test
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists