[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1de5d955-91f9-032c-0ceb-2e48d04464dc@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:23:49 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom,msm8998-cpu-bwmon:
add BWMON device
On 30/06/2022 13:14, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
> On 6/29/2022 7:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Add bindings for the Qualcomm Bandwidth Monitor device providing
>> performance data on interconnects. The bindings describe only BWMON CPU
>> (version 4), e.g. the instance which appeared for the first on Qualcomm
>> MSM8998 SoC and is also used on SDM845. This BWMON device sits between
>> CPU and Last Level Cache Controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Acked-by: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> .../interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..76e09658d615
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interconnect/qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Qualcomm Interconnect Bandwidth Monitor
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> + Bandwidth Monitor measures current throughput on buses between various NoC
>> + fabrics and provides information when it crosses configured thresholds.
>> +
>> + Certain SoCs might have more than one Bandwidth Monitors, for example on SDM845::
>> + - Measuring the bandwidth between CPUs and Last Level Cache Controller -
>> + called LLCC BWMON,
>> + - Measuring the bandwidth between Last Level Cache Controller and memory (DDR).
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon
>> + - const: qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon
>> + - const: qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon # BWMON v4
>> +
>> + interconnects:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + interrupts:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + operating-points-v2: true
>> + opp-table: true
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + # BWMON v4 (currently described) and BWMON v5 use one register address
>> + # space. BWMON v2 uses two register spaces - not yet described.
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - interconnects
>> + - interrupts
>> + - operating-points-v2
>> + - opp-table
>> + - reg
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm845.h>
>> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +
>> + pmu@...6400 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon";
>
> so with this compatible fallback scheme, I am trying to understand what
> do I need to do if I have to add support for another SoC for instance.
>
> I just update the binding with the new SoC compatible (lets say qcom,sc7280-llcc-bwmon)
> and in the device tree node use it as
> compatible = "qcom,sc7280-llcc-bwmon", "qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon";
> without any updates in the driver?
I expect:
"qcom,sc7280-llcc-bwmon", "qcom,msm8998-llcc-bwmon";
and you need to add sc7280 compatible to the driver. The actual proper
solution in my patch would be to use msm8998 compatible in the driver,
but I did not test MSM8998.
Maybe we should switch to that anyway?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists