| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220630122622.55492-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:26:22 +0800
From: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yekai13@...wei.com>, <liulongfang@...wei.com>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
<shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] crypto: hisilicon/sec - don't sleep when in softirq
When kunpeng920 encryption driver is used to deencrypt and decrypt
packets during the softirq, it is not allowed to use mutex lock. The
kernel will report the following error:
BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/57/0/0x00000300
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e4
show_stack+0x20/0x2c
dump_stack+0xd8/0x140
__schedule_bug+0x68/0x80
__schedule+0x728/0x840
schedule+0x50/0xe0
schedule_preempt_disabled+0x18/0x24
__mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x594/0x5dc
__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1c/0x30
mutex_lock+0x50/0x60
sec_request_init+0x8c/0x1a0 [hisi_sec2]
sec_process+0x28/0x1ac [hisi_sec2]
sec_skcipher_crypto+0xf4/0x1d4 [hisi_sec2]
sec_skcipher_encrypt+0x1c/0x30 [hisi_sec2]
crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x2c/0x40
crypto_authenc_encrypt+0xc8/0xfc [authenc]
crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40
echainiv_encrypt+0x144/0x1a0 [echainiv]
crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40
esp_output_tail+0x348/0x5c0 [esp4]
esp_output+0x120/0x19c [esp4]
xfrm_output_one+0x25c/0x4d4
xfrm_output_resume+0x6c/0x1fc
xfrm_output+0xac/0x3c0
xfrm4_output+0x64/0x130
ip_build_and_send_pkt+0x158/0x20c
tcp_v4_send_synack+0xdc/0x1f0
tcp_conn_request+0x7d0/0x994
tcp_v4_conn_request+0x58/0x6c
tcp_v6_conn_request+0xf0/0x100
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x1cc/0xd60
tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x10c/0x250
tcp_v4_rcv+0xfc4/0x10a4
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xf4/0x200
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x58/0x70
ip_local_deliver+0x68/0x120
ip_sublist_rcv_finish+0x70/0x94
ip_list_rcv_finish.constprop.0+0x17c/0x1d0
ip_sublist_rcv+0x40/0xb0
ip_list_rcv+0x140/0x1dc
__netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x154/0x28c
__netif_receive_skb_list+0x120/0x1a0
netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0xe4/0x1f0
napi_complete_done+0x70/0x1f0
gro_cell_poll+0x9c/0xb0
napi_poll+0xcc/0x264
net_rx_action+0xd4/0x21c
__do_softirq+0x130/0x358
irq_exit+0x11c/0x13c
__handle_domain_irq+0x88/0xf0
gic_handle_irq+0x78/0x2c0
el1_irq+0xb8/0x140
arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x40
default_idle_call+0x5c/0x1c0
cpuidle_idle_call+0x174/0x1b0
do_idle+0xc8/0x160
cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x11c
secondary_start_kernel+0x158/0x1e4
softirq: huh, entered softirq 3 NET_RX 0000000093774ee4 with
preempt_count 00000100, exited with fffffe00?
V1: use spin_lock will cause soft lockup
Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
---
drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h | 2 +-
drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h
index 42bb486f3b6d..d2a0bc93e752 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct sec_qp_ctx {
struct idr req_idr;
struct sec_alg_res res[QM_Q_DEPTH];
struct sec_ctx *ctx;
- struct mutex req_lock;
+ spinlock_t req_lock;
struct list_head backlog;
struct hisi_acc_sgl_pool *c_in_pool;
struct hisi_acc_sgl_pool *c_out_pool;
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
index 6eebe739893c..71dfa7db6394 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
@@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static int sec_alloc_req_id(struct sec_req *req, struct sec_qp_ctx *qp_ctx)
{
int req_id;
- mutex_lock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
req_id = idr_alloc_cyclic(&qp_ctx->req_idr, NULL,
0, QM_Q_DEPTH, GFP_ATOMIC);
- mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
if (unlikely(req_id < 0)) {
dev_err(req->ctx->dev, "alloc req id fail!\n");
return req_id;
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ static void sec_free_req_id(struct sec_req *req)
qp_ctx->req_list[req_id] = NULL;
req->qp_ctx = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
idr_remove(&qp_ctx->req_idr, req_id);
- mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
}
static u8 pre_parse_finished_bd(struct bd_status *status, void *resp)
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int sec_bd_send(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *req)
!(req->flag & CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG))
return -EBUSY;
- mutex_lock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
ret = hisi_qp_send(qp_ctx->qp, &req->sec_sqe);
if (ctx->fake_req_limit <=
@@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ static int sec_bd_send(struct sec_ctx *ctx, struct sec_req *req)
list_add_tail(&req->backlog_head, &qp_ctx->backlog);
atomic64_inc(&ctx->sec->debug.dfx.send_cnt);
atomic64_inc(&ctx->sec->debug.dfx.send_busy_cnt);
- mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
return -EBUSY;
}
- mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY))
return -ENOBUFS;
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int sec_create_qp_ctx(struct hisi_qm *qm, struct sec_ctx *ctx,
qp->req_cb = sec_req_cb;
- mutex_init(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
idr_init(&qp_ctx->req_idr);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qp_ctx->backlog);
@@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ static struct sec_req *sec_back_req_clear(struct sec_ctx *ctx,
{
struct sec_req *backlog_req = NULL;
- mutex_lock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
if (ctx->fake_req_limit >=
atomic_read(&qp_ctx->qp->qp_status.used) &&
!list_empty(&qp_ctx->backlog)) {
@@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ static struct sec_req *sec_back_req_clear(struct sec_ctx *ctx,
typeof(*backlog_req), backlog_head);
list_del(&backlog_req->backlog_head);
}
- mutex_unlock(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&qp_ctx->req_lock);
return backlog_req;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists