linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] UML: add support for KASAN under x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220630125434.GA20153@axis.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:54:34 +0200
From:   Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
CC:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@...gle.com>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        "anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com" <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "linux-um@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "kunit-dev@...glegroups.com" <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] UML: add support for KASAN under x86_64

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:41:04AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 10:08, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/Makefile b/arch/um/kernel/Makefile
> > index 1c2d4b29a3d4..a089217e2f0e 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/um/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK) += early_printk.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP) += ioport.o
> >
> > +KASAN_SANITIZE_stacktrace.o := n
> > +KASAN_SANITIZE_sysrq.o := n
> 
> Why are these needed?
> It's helpful to leave some comments for any of *_SANITIZE:=n.
> Otherwise later it's unclear if it's due to some latent bugs, some
> inherent incompatibility, something that can be fixed, etc.

I believe I saw the stacktrace code itself triggering KASAN splats and
causing recursion when sanitization was not disabled on it.  I noticed
that other architectures disabled sanitization of their stacktrace code,
eg. ARM in commit 4d576cab16f57e1f87978f ("ARM: 9028/1: disable KASAN in
call stack capturing routines"), so I did not investigate it further.

(Note that despite the name, sysrq.c is also just stacktrace code.)