linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SCMI full message tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220701151359.4vnbhroubk7kswrw@bogus>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:13:59 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SCMI full message tracing

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:03:38AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> Hi,
> LGTM, I appreciate this change. For testing, I fed  your sample output to this:
>

Thanks!

>      perl -MData::Dumper -nae  's/^.+scmi_msg_dump:// && print Dumper
> { (map { split /=/; } split" ") }' < scmi.txt
> 
> which gives this
> 
> $VAR1 = {
>           'pt' => '15',
>           'seq' => '0000',
>           'pyld' =>
> '000000000800000009daffffffffffff008268d4c075fd1611daffffffffffff008268d4c075fd1619daffffffffffff008268d4c075fd16',
>           'msg_id' => '01',
>           's' => '0',
>           't' => 'NOTI'
>         };
> which is what I wanted.   BTW, if I ever write a script that would
> take this SCMI trace text and
> decode it to nice cmd names and arguments -- where would I submit such a script?
>

I am not 100% sure. After reading this, the first thoughts were scripts/
or tools/scripts but looking at the content I am less sure about latter.
Worth posting and then check what people have to say once this lands upstream.
Or even once this is merged into -next officially.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep