[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5312a278-b6c2-4778-97c8-3c8628d9ee38@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 10:08:42 -0600
From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, 21cnbao@...il.com,
corbet@....net, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, hagen@...u.net, jack@...e.cz,
keescook@...omium.org, kirill@...temov.name, kucharsk@...il.com,
linkinjeon@...nel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
longpeng2@...wei.com, luto@...nel.org, markhemm@...glemail.com,
pcc@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org, sieberf@...zon.com,
sjpark@...zon.de, surenb@...gle.com, tst@...oebel-theuer.de,
yzaikin@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: Add msharefs filesystem
On 6/30/22 16:57, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 04:53:52PM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote:
>> +static int
>> +msharefs_d_hash(const struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *qstr)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long hash = init_name_hash(dentry);
>> + const unsigned char *s = qstr->name;
>> + unsigned int len = qstr->len;
>> +
>> + while (len--)
>> + hash = partial_name_hash(*s++, hash);
>> + qstr->hash = end_name_hash(hash);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> What do you need that for and how is it different from letting it
> use full_name_hash() (which is what it will do if you leave
> dentry_operations->d_hash equal to NULL)?
I don't have a specific reason to use msharefs_d_hash(). If full_name_hash() can work, I don't mind reducing amount of
code in my patch. I will take a look at it.
Thanks,
Khalid
Powered by blists - more mailing lists