linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Enumerate platforms with single msi interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220701183819.GB1284915-robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:38:19 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Enumerate platforms with
 single msi interrupt

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:38:42AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:33:35AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 29/06/2022 16:09, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Explicitly enumerate the older platforms that have a single msi host
> > > interrupt. This allows for adding further platforms without resorting
> > > to nested conditionals.
> > > 
> > > Drop the redundant comment about older chipsets instead of moving it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> > 
> > This does not exist in linux-next, so it should be squashed it with the
> > previous series.
> 
> As mentioned in the cover letter this depends on the MSI series that has
> unfortunately not yet been merged.
> 
> That series is self-contained and ready to be merged, so this follow-up
> does not need to be squashed in.

I suspect that Bjorn would rather squash these in.

Rob