[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220701205458.985106-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 13:54:57 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Don't sort the task scan result from /proc
It should not sort the result as procfs already returns a proper
ordering of tasks. Actually sorting the order caused problems that it
doesn't guararantee to process the main thread first.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c b/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
index 27acdc5e5723..a068f42833c3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ static int __event__synthesize_thread(union perf_event *comm_event,
snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s/proc/%d/task",
machine->root_dir, pid);
- n = scandir(filename, &dirent, filter_task, alphasort);
+ n = scandir(filename, &dirent, filter_task, NULL);
if (n < 0)
return n;
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_threads(struct perf_tool *tool,
return 0;
snprintf(proc_path, sizeof(proc_path), "%s/proc", machine->root_dir);
- n = scandir(proc_path, &dirent, filter_task, alphasort);
+ n = scandir(proc_path, &dirent, filter_task, NULL);
if (n < 0)
return err;
--
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists