linux-kernel - Re: [Patch net-next v14 11/13] net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: add phylink_mac_link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ef3e69289552f93ee94151a68c0ff3cf1226963.camel@microchip.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 05:44:52 +0000
From:   <Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com>
To:     <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     <andrew@...n.ch>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        <ast@...nel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <olteanv@...il.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <andrii@...nel.org>, <songliubraving@...com>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <yhs@...com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v14 11/13] net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: add
 phylink_mac_link_up support

Hi Russell,
Thanks for the review comment.

On Thu, 2022-06-30 at 12:42 +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
> 
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:50:39PM +0530, Arun Ramadoss wrote:
> > +static void lan937x_config_gbit(struct ksz_device *dev, bool gbit,
> > u8 *data)
> > +{
> > +     if (gbit)
> > +             *data &= ~PORT_MII_NOT_1GBIT;
> > +     else
> > +             *data |= PORT_MII_NOT_1GBIT;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void lan937x_config_interface(struct ksz_device *dev, int
> > port,
> > +                                  int speed, int duplex,
> > +                                  bool tx_pause, bool rx_pause)
> > +{
> > +     u8 xmii_ctrl0, xmii_ctrl1;
> > +
> > +     ksz_pread8(dev, port, REG_PORT_XMII_CTRL_0, &xmii_ctrl0);
> > +     ksz_pread8(dev, port, REG_PORT_XMII_CTRL_1, &xmii_ctrl1);
> > +
> > +     switch (speed) {
> > +     case SPEED_1000:
> > +             lan937x_config_gbit(dev, true, &xmii_ctrl1);
> > +             break;
> > +     case SPEED_100:
> > +             lan937x_config_gbit(dev, false, &xmii_ctrl1);
> > +             xmii_ctrl0 |= PORT_MII_100MBIT;
> > +             break;
> > +     case SPEED_10:
> > +             lan937x_config_gbit(dev, false, &xmii_ctrl1);
> > +             xmii_ctrl0 &= ~PORT_MII_100MBIT;
> > +             break;
> > +     default:
> > +             dev_err(dev->dev, "Unsupported speed on port %d:
> > %d\n",
> > +                     port, speed);
> > +             return;
> > +     }
> 
> Isn't this:
> 
>         if (speed == SPEED_1000)
>                 xmii_ctrl1 &= ~PORT_MII_NOT_1GBIT;
>         else
>                 xmii_ctrl1 |= PORT_MII_NOT_1GBIT;
> 
>         if (speed == SPEED_100)
>                 xmii_ctrl0 |= PORT_MII_100MBIT;
>         else
>                 xmii_ctrl0 &= ~PORT_MII_100MBIT;
> 
> There isn't much need to validate that "speed" is correct, you've
> already told phylink that you only support 1G, 100M and 10M so you're
> not going to get called with anything except one of those.

Ok, I will update the code.

> 
> > +
> > +     if (duplex)
> > +             xmii_ctrl0 |= PORT_MII_FULL_DUPLEX;
> > +     else
> > +             xmii_ctrl0 &= ~PORT_MII_FULL_DUPLEX;
> > +
> > +     if (tx_pause)
> > +             xmii_ctrl0 |= PORT_MII_TX_FLOW_CTRL;
> > +     else
> > +             xmii_ctrl1 &= ~PORT_MII_TX_FLOW_CTRL;
> 
> It seems weird to set a bit in one register and clear it in a
> different
> register. I suspect you mean xmii_ctrl0 here.

Sorry, its a typo mistake. I will update the register.

> 
> > +
> > +     if (rx_pause)
> > +             xmii_ctrl0 |= PORT_MII_RX_FLOW_CTRL;
> > +     else
> > +             xmii_ctrl0 &= ~PORT_MII_RX_FLOW_CTRL;
> > +
> > +     ksz_pwrite8(dev, port, REG_PORT_XMII_CTRL_0, xmii_ctrl0);
> > +     ksz_pwrite8(dev, port, REG_PORT_XMII_CTRL_1, xmii_ctrl1);
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!