[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yr6KcPlC/3rYAtKE@lahna>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:47:28 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] ACPI: utils: Introduce
acpi_match_video_device_handle() helper
Hi Andy,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 12:28:15AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> extern long acpi_is_video_device(acpi_handle handle);
> +extern bool acpi_match_video_device_handle(acpi_handle handle);
I think we can do slightly better here. The only caller of
acpi_is_video_device() is in drivers/acpi/video_detect.c so we can move
it there and make it static (is_video_device()).
Then we can name this one acpi_is_video_device() instead and in addition
make it take struct acpi_device as parameter instead of acpi_handle (I
think we should not use acpi_handles in drivers if possible).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists