linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: am33xx: Fix MMCHS0 dma properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHRgzyOgmxTVV6sqSk_ZWYytergDj5haW=EdFCKCyTg+r6Zd-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:14:41 +0800
From:   Yu-Tung Chang <mtwget@...il.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: am33xx: Fix MMCHS0 dma properties

Yu-Tung Chang <mtwget@...il.com> 于2022年7月1日周五 14:04写道：
>
> Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> 于2022年6月27日周一 18:54写道：
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > * YuTong Chang <mtwget@...il.com> [220620 15:36]:
> > > According to technical manual(table 11-24), the DMA of MMCHS0 should be
> > > direct mapped.
> >
> > Could this be a bug in the manual assuming mmchs0 is working? Or does this
> > fix something for you?
> >
> It modified in commit b5e5090660742c838ddc0b5d1a001e6fe3d5bfd5,
> the dma of mmc1 was changed to edma_xbar and did not explain why it should
> not match the document.
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tony
No evidence of any official documentation error, before submitting
b5e5090660742c838ddc0b5d1a001e6fe3d5bfd5, the mmc1 dma properties
matches the official documentation.