[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220701074923.657426-4-yukuai3@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:49:17 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: tj@...nel.org, mkoutny@...e.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
ming.lei@...hat.com
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yukuai1@...weicloud.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/8] blk-throttle: prevent overflow while calculating wait time
In tg_with_in_bps_limit(), 'bps_limit * jiffy_elapsed_rnd' might
overflow. FIx the problem by calling mul_u64_u64_div_u64() instead.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
---
block/blk-throttle.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index 5c1d1c4d8188..a89c62bef2fb 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static bool tg_with_in_bps_limit(struct throtl_grp *tg, struct bio *bio,
u64 bps_limit, unsigned long *wait)
{
bool rw = bio_data_dir(bio);
- u64 bytes_allowed, extra_bytes, tmp;
+ u64 bytes_allowed, extra_bytes;
unsigned long jiffy_elapsed, jiffy_wait, jiffy_elapsed_rnd;
unsigned int bio_size = throtl_bio_data_size(bio);
@@ -824,10 +824,8 @@ static bool tg_with_in_bps_limit(struct throtl_grp *tg, struct bio *bio,
jiffy_elapsed_rnd = tg->td->throtl_slice;
jiffy_elapsed_rnd = roundup(jiffy_elapsed_rnd, tg->td->throtl_slice);
-
- tmp = bps_limit * jiffy_elapsed_rnd;
- do_div(tmp, HZ);
- bytes_allowed = tmp;
+ bytes_allowed = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(bps_limit, (u64)jiffy_elapsed_rnd,
+ (u64)HZ);
if (tg->bytes_disp[rw] + bio_size <= bytes_allowed) {
if (wait)
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists