lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17c90e55-4560-fa37-398a-4de3838704ca@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 09:02:27 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        <joro@...tes.org>, <will@...nel.org>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <hch@....de>,
        <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, <robin.murphy@....com>
CC:     <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] scsi: core: Cap shost max_sectors according to DMA
 limits only once

On 01/07/2022 00:41, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>   
>>   	shost->dma_dev = dma_dev;
>>   
>> +	if (dma_dev->dma_mask) {
>> +		shost->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, shost->max_sectors,
>> +				dma_max_mapping_size(dma_dev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
>> +	}
> Nit: you could remove the curly brackets... But it being a multi-line
> statement, having them is OK too I think.
> 

tglx seems to think that they are ok, and I generally agree (now):

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/877djwdorz.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/

AFAICT coding-style.rst is ok with them in this scenario too

Cheers,
John

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ