[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fab41f28-8f48-9f40-09c8-fd5f0714a9e0@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:21:48 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org, marcan@...can.st, sven@...npeter.dev,
robdclark@...il.com, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, orsonzhai@...il.com,
baolin.wang7@...il.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
jean-philippe@...aro.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
jgg@...dia.com, kevin.tian@...el.com
Cc: suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, alyssa@...enzweig.io,
dwmw2@...radead.org, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
vdumpa@...dia.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
chenxiang66@...ilicon.com, john.garry@...wei.com,
yangyingliang@...wei.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible domain
and device/group
On 2022-06-30 21:36, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Cases like VFIO wish to attach a device to an existing domain that was
> not allocated specifically from the device. This raises a condition
> where the IOMMU driver can fail the domain attach because the domain and
> device are incompatible with each other.
>
> This is a soft failure that can be resolved by using a different domain.
>
> Provide a dedicated errno from the IOMMU driver during attach that the
> reason attached failed is because of domain incompatability. EMEDIUMTYPE
> is chosen because it is never used within the iommu subsystem today and
> evokes a sense that the 'medium' aka the domain is incompatible.
>
> VFIO can use this to know attach is a soft failure and it should continue
> searching. Otherwise the attach will be a hard failure and VFIO will
> return the code to userspace.
>
> Update all drivers to return EMEDIUMTYPE in their failure paths that are
> related to domain incompatability. Also remove adjacent error prints for
> these soft failures, to prevent a kernel log spam, since -EMEDIUMTYPE is
> clear enough to indicate an incompatability error.
>
> Add kdocs describing this behavior.
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index 2ed3594f384e..072cac5ab5a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1135,10 +1135,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
> - dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n");
> - return -ENXIO;
> - }
> + if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops)
> + return -EMEDIUMTYPE;
This is the wrong check, you want the "if (smmu_domain->smmu != smmu)"
condition further down. If this one fails it's effectively because the
device doesn't have an IOMMU at all, and similar to patch #3 it will be
removed once the core code takes over properly (I even have both those
patches written now!)
Thanks,
Robin.
> /*
> * FIXME: The arch/arm DMA API code tries to attach devices to its own
Powered by blists - more mailing lists