linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] hisi_lpc: Use acpi_dev_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9666883-3285-36a6-6278-ace219b88f3c@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:49:28 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] hisi_lpc: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child()

On 30/06/2022 19:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] hisi_lpc: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child()
> 
> Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
> use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to carry out an action for all of
> the given ACPI device's children.
> 
> This will help to eliminate the children list head from struct
> acpi_device as it is redundant and it is used in questionable ways
> in some places (in particular, locking is needed for walking the
> list pointed to it safely, but it is often missing).
> 
> While at it, simplify hisi_lpc_acpi_set_io_res() by making it accept
> a struct acpi_device pointer from the caller, instead of going to
> struct device and back to get the same result, and clean up confusion
> regarding hostdev and its ACPI companion in that function.
> 
> Also remove a redundant check from it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

This change itself looks fine and I quickly tested, so:
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

However Yang Yingliang spotted a pre-existing bug in the ACPI probe and 
sent a fix today (coincidence?):

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220701094352.2104998-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com/T/#u

And they conflict. This code has been this way for years, so I just 
suggest Yang Yingliang resends the fix on top off Rafael's change.

Thanks,
John