lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:04:30 +0000
From:   "Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi (Temp) (QUIC)" <quic_vnivarth@...cinc.com>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        "Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi (Temp) (QUIC)" <quic_vnivarth@...cinc.com>
CC:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        "bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Mukesh Savaliya (QUIC)" <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Subject: RE: [V2] tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: Fix get_clk_div_rate() which
 otherwise could return a sub-optimal clock rate.

Hi,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 4:45 AM
> To: Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi (Temp) (QUIC) <quic_vnivarth@...cinc.com>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>; bjorn.andersson@...aro.org; Konrad
> Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>; linux-arm-
> msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>; linux-serial@...r.kernel.org; LKML
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Mukesh Savaliya (QUIC)
> <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>; Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>;
> Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Subject: Re: [V2] tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: Fix get_clk_div_rate() which
> otherwise could return a sub-optimal clock rate.
> 
> 
> 
> > +                               /* Save the first (lowest freq) within tolerance */
> > +                               ser_clk = freq;
> > +                               *clk_div = new_div;
> > +                               /* no more search for exact match required in 2nd run */
> > +                               if (!exact_match)
> > +                                       break;
> > +                       }
> > +               }
> >
> > -               prev = freq;
> > +               div = freq / desired_clk + 1;
> 
> Can't you infinite loop now?
> 
> Start with:
> 
> desired_clk = 10000
> div = 1
> percent_tol = 2
> 
> 
> Now:
> 
> mult = 10000
> offset = 200
> test_freq = 9800
> freq = 9800
> div = 9800 / 10000 + 1 = 0 + 1 = 1
> 
> ...and then you'll loop again with "div = 1", won't you? ...or did I get
> something wrong in my analysis? This is the reason my proposed algorithm
> had two loops.
> 
> 

I went back to your proposed algorithm and made couple of simple changes, and it seemed like what we need.

a) look only for exact match once a clock rate within tolerance is found
b) swap test_freq and freq at end of while loops to make it run as desired


	maxdiv = CLK_DIV_MSK >> CLK_DIV_SHFT;
	div = 1;

	while (div < maxdiv) {
		mult = (unsigned long long)div * desired_clk;
		if (mult != (unsigned long)mult)
			break;

		if (ser_clk)
			offset = 0;
		===================a=====================
		else
			offset = div_u64(mult * percent_tol, 100);

		/*
		 * Loop requesting (freq - 2%) and possibly (freq).
		 *
		 * We'll keep track of the lowest freq inexact match we found
		 * but always try to find a perfect match. NOTE: this algorithm
		 * could miss a slightly better freq if there's more than one
		 * freq between (freq - 2%) and (freq) but (freq) can't be made
		 * exactly, but that's OK.
		 *
		 * This absolutely relies on the fact that the Qualcomm clock
		 * driver always rounds up.
		 */
		test_freq = mult - offset;
		while (test_freq <= mult) {
			freq = clk_round_rate(clk, test_freq);

			/*
			 * A dead-on freq is an insta-win. This implicitly
			 * handles when "freq == mult"
			 */
			if (!(freq % desired_clk)) {
				*clk_div = freq / desired_clk;
				return freq;
			}

			/*
			 * Only time clock framework doesn't round up is if
			 * we're past the max clock rate. We're done searching
			 * if that's the case.
			 */
			if (freq < test_freq)
				return ser_clk;

			/* Save the first (lowest freq) within tolerance */
			if (!ser_clk && freq <= mult + offset) {
				ser_clk = freq;
				*clk_div = div;
			}

			/*
			 * If we already rounded up past mult then this will
			 * cause the loop to exit. If not then this will run
			 * the loop a second time with exactly mult.
			 */
			test_freq = max(test_freq + 1, mult);
			                             ====b====
		}

		/*
		 * freq will always be bigger than mult by at least 1.
		 * That means we can get the next divider with a DIV_ROUND_UP.
		 * This has the advantage of skipping by a whole bunch of divs
		 * If the clock framework already bypassed them.
		 */
		div = DIV_ROUND_UP(freq, desired_clk);
		                                       ===b==
	}


Will also drop exact_match now.

Will upload v3 after testing.

Thank you,
Vijay/


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ