lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yr7mcjRq57laZGEY@boxer>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:20:02 +0200
From:   Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: adjust XDP SOCKETS after file movement

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 06:28:10AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Commit f36600634282 ("libbpf: move xsk.{c,h} into selftests/bpf") moves
> files tools/{lib => testing/selftests}/bpf/xsk.[ch], but misses to adjust
> the XDP SOCKETS (AF_XDP) section in MAINTAINERS.
> 
> Adjust the file entry after this file movement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
> ---
> Andrii, please ack.
> 
> Alexei, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up on top of the commit above.
> 
>  MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index fa4bfa3d10bf..27d9e65b9a85 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -22042,7 +22042,7 @@ F:	include/uapi/linux/xdp_diag.h
>  F:	include/net/netns/xdp.h
>  F:	net/xdp/
>  F:	samples/bpf/xdpsock*
> -F:	tools/lib/bpf/xsk*
> +F:	tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk*

Magnus, this doesn't cover xdpxceiver.
How about we move the lib part and xdpxceiver part to a dedicated
directory? Or would it be too nested from main dir POV?

>  
>  XEN BLOCK SUBSYSTEM
>  M:	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ