| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:05:50 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Christian Loehle <CLoehle@...erstone.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv4] mmc: block: Add single read for 4k sector cards
> On 1/07/22 15:43, Christian Loehle wrote:
> > Cards with 4k native sector size may only be read 4k-aligned,
> > accommodate for this in the single read recovery and use it.
> >
> > Fixes: 81196976ed946 (mmc: block: Add blk-mq support)
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <cloehle@...erstone.com>
>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c index
> > f4a1281658db..912a398a9a76 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> > @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static inline int mmc_blk_part_switch(struct
> mmc_card *card,
> > unsigned int part_type); static
> > void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> > struct mmc_card *card,
> > - int disable_multi,
> > + int recovery_mode,
> > struct mmc_queue *mq); static void
> > mmc_blk_hsq_req_done(struct mmc_request *mrq);
> >
> > @@ -1302,7 +1302,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_eval_resp_error(struct
> > mmc_blk_request *brq) }
> >
> > static void mmc_blk_data_prep(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct
> mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> > - int disable_multi, bool *do_rel_wr_p,
> > + int recovery_mode, bool *do_rel_wr_p,
> > bool *do_data_tag_p) {
> > struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->blkdata; @@ -1368,12 +1368,12 @@
> > static void mmc_blk_data_prep(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct
> mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> > brq->data.blocks--;
> >
> > /*
> > - * After a read error, we redo the request one sector
> > + * After a read error, we redo the request one (native)
> > + sector
> > * at a time in order to accurately determine which
> > * sectors can be read successfully.
> > */
> > - if (disable_multi)
> > - brq->data.blocks = 1;
> > + if (recovery_mode)
> > + brq->data.blocks =
> > + queue_physical_block_size(mq->queue) >> 9;
> >
> > /*
> > * Some controllers have HW issues while operating @@
> > -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_cqe_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue
> > *mq, struct request *req)
> >
> > static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> > struct mmc_card *card,
> > - int disable_multi,
> > + int recovery_mode,
> > struct mmc_queue *mq) {
> > u32 readcmd, writecmd;
> > @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct
> mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> > struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->blkdata;
> > bool do_rel_wr, do_data_tag;
> >
> > - mmc_blk_data_prep(mq, mqrq, disable_multi, &do_rel_wr,
> &do_data_tag);
> > + mmc_blk_data_prep(mq, mqrq, recovery_mode, &do_rel_wr,
> > + &do_data_tag);
> >
> > brq->mrq.cmd = &brq->cmd;
> >
> > @@ -1690,7 +1690,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_fix_state(struct mmc_card
> > *card, struct request *req)
> >
> > #define MMC_READ_SINGLE_RETRIES 2
> >
> > -/* Single sector read during recovery */
> > +/* Single (native) sector read during recovery */
> > static void mmc_blk_read_single(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request
> > *req) {
> > struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq = req_to_mmc_queue_req(req); @@
> > -1698,6 +1698,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_read_single(struct mmc_queue
> *mq, struct request *req)
> > struct mmc_card *card = mq->card;
> > struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
> > blk_status_t error = BLK_STS_OK;
> > + size_t bytes_per_read = queue_physical_block_size(mq->queue);
> >
> > do {
> > u32 status;
> > @@ -1732,13 +1733,13 @@ static void mmc_blk_read_single(struct
> mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> > else
> > error = BLK_STS_OK;
> >
> > - } while (blk_update_request(req, error, 512));
> > + } while (blk_update_request(req, error, bytes_per_read));
> >
> > return;
> >
> > error_exit:
> > mrq->data->bytes_xfered = 0;
> > - blk_update_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR, 512);
> > + blk_update_request(req, BLK_STS_IOERR, bytes_per_read);
> > /* Let it try the remaining request again */
> > if (mqrq->retries > MMC_MAX_RETRIES - 1)
> > mqrq->retries = MMC_MAX_RETRIES - 1; @@ -1879,10 +1880,9
> > @@ static void mmc_blk_mq_rw_recovery(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct
> request *req)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - /* FIXME: Missing single sector read for large sector size */
> > - if (!mmc_large_sector(card) && rq_data_dir(req) == READ &&
> > - brq->data.blocks > 1) {
> > - /* Read one sector at a time */
> > + if (rq_data_dir(req) == READ && brq->data.blocks >
> > + queue_physical_block_size(mq->queue) >> 9) {
> > + /* Read one (native) sector at a time */
> > mmc_blk_read_single(mq, req);
> > return;
> > }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists