lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 2 Jul 2022 12:50:01 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
        "djakov@...nel.org" <djakov@...nel.org>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        "abailon@...libre.com" <abailon@...libre.com>,
        "laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com" 
        <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "marex@...x.de" <marex@...x.de>,
        "paul.elder@...asonboard.com" <paul.elder@...asonboard.com>,
        "Markus.Niebel@...tq-group.com" <Markus.Niebel@...tq-group.com>,
        "aford173@...il.com" <aford173@...il.com>
CC:     "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "abelvesa@...nel.org" <abelvesa@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 8/9] interconnect: imx: configure NoC
 mode/prioriry/ext_control

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 8/9] interconnect: imx: configure NoC
> mode/prioriry/ext_control
> 
> Am Donnerstag, dem 16.06.2022 um 15:33 +0800 schrieb Peng Fan (OSS):
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > Introduce imx_icc_noc_setting structure to describe a master port
> > setting Pass imx_icc_noc_setting as a parameter from specific driver
> > Set priority level, mode, ext control in imx_icc_node_set
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c    | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h    | 44
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c |  2 +-
> > drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c |  2 +-
> > drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c |  2 +-
> >  5 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
> > b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c index 78557fe6da2c..bd728caf2b85
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > @@ -21,8 +22,10 @@
> >  /* private icc_node data */
> >  struct imx_icc_node {
> >  	const struct imx_icc_node_desc *desc;
> > +	const struct imx_icc_noc_setting *setting;
> >  	struct device *qos_dev;
> >  	struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req;
> > +	struct imx_icc_provider *imx_provider;
> >  };
> >
> >  static int imx_icc_get_bw(struct icc_node *node, u32 *avg, u32 *peak)
> > @@ -37,8 +40,24 @@ static int imx_icc_node_set(struct icc_node *node)
> > {
> >  	struct device *dev = node->provider->dev;
> >  	struct imx_icc_node *node_data = node->data;
> > +	void __iomem *base;
> > +	u32 prio;
> >  	u64 freq;
> >
> > +	if (node_data->setting && !node_data->setting->ignore && node-
> >peak_bw) {
> > +		base = node_data->setting->reg + node_data-
> >imx_provider->noc_base;
> > +		if (node_data->setting->mode == IMX_NOC_MODE_FIXED) {
> > +			prio = node_data->setting->prio_level;
> > +			prio = PRIORITY_COMP_MARK | (prio << 8) | prio;
> > +			writel(prio, base + IMX_NOC_PRIO_REG);
> > +			writel(node_data->setting->mode, base +
> IMX_NOC_MODE_REG);
> > +			writel(node_data->setting->ext_control, base +
> IMX_NOC_EXT_CTL_REG);
> > +		} else {
> > +			dev_info(dev, "mode: %d not supported\n",
> node_data->setting->mode);
> > +			return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	if (!node_data->qos_dev)
> >  		return 0;
> >
> > @@ -135,7 +154,8 @@ static int imx_icc_node_init_qos(struct
> > icc_provider *provider,  }
> >
> >  static struct icc_node *imx_icc_node_add(struct imx_icc_provider
> *imx_provider,
> > -					 const struct imx_icc_node_desc
> *node_desc)
> > +					 const struct imx_icc_node_desc
> *node_desc,
> > +					 const struct imx_icc_noc_setting
> *setting)
> >  {
> >  	struct icc_provider *provider = &imx_provider->provider;
> >  	struct device *dev = provider->dev;
> > @@ -164,6 +184,8 @@ static struct icc_node *imx_icc_node_add(struct
> imx_icc_provider *imx_provider,
> >  	node->name = node_desc->name;
> >  	node->data = node_data;
> >  	node_data->desc = node_desc;
> > +	node_data->setting = setting;
> > +	node_data->imx_provider = imx_provider;
> >  	icc_node_add(node, provider);
> >
> >  	if (node_desc->adj) {
> > @@ -187,7 +209,8 @@ static void imx_icc_unregister_nodes(struct
> > icc_provider *provider)
> >
> >  static int imx_icc_register_nodes(struct imx_icc_provider *imx_provider,
> >  				  const struct imx_icc_node_desc *descs,
> > -				  int count)
> > +				  int count,
> > +				  const struct imx_icc_noc_setting *settings)
> >  {
> >  	struct icc_provider *provider = &imx_provider->provider;
> >  	struct icc_onecell_data *provider_data = provider->data; @@ -
> 199,7
> > +222,10 @@ static int imx_icc_register_nodes(struct imx_icc_provider
> *imx_provider,
> >  		const struct imx_icc_node_desc *node_desc = &descs[i];
> >  		size_t j;
> >
> > -		node = imx_icc_node_add(imx_provider, node_desc);
> > +		if (settings)
> > +			node = imx_icc_node_add(imx_provider, node_desc,
> &settings[node_desc->id]);
> > +		else
> > +			node = imx_icc_node_add(imx_provider, node_desc,
> NULL);
> 
> Maybe just write as
> node = imx_icc_node_add(imx_provider, node_desc, settings ?
> &settings[node_desc->id] : NULL);

Sure, cleaner.

> 
> But I don't really care, so feel free to ignore this suggestion if you don't like it.
> 
> >  		if (IS_ERR(node)) {
> >  			ret = dev_err_probe(provider->dev, PTR_ERR(node),
> >  					    "failed to add %s\n",
> > node_desc->name);
> > @@ -237,7 +263,8 @@ static int get_max_node_id(struct
> > imx_icc_node_desc *nodes, int nodes_count)  }
> >
> >  int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > -		     struct imx_icc_node_desc *nodes, int
> > nodes_count)
> > +		     struct imx_icc_node_desc *nodes, int
> > nodes_count,
> > +		     struct imx_icc_noc_setting *settings)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >  	struct icc_onecell_data *data;
> > @@ -267,13 +294,19 @@ int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device
> > *pdev,
> >  	provider->dev->of_node = dev->parent->of_node;
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, imx_provider);
> >
> > +	if (settings) {
> > +		imx_provider->noc_base = devm_of_iomap(dev,
> > provider->dev->of_node, 0, NULL);
> > +		if (!imx_provider->noc_base)
> > +			return PTR_ERR(imx_provider->noc_base);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	ret = icc_provider_add(provider);
> >  	if (ret) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "error adding interconnect provider:
> > %d\n", ret);
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	ret = imx_icc_register_nodes(imx_provider, nodes,
> > nodes_count);
> > +	ret = imx_icc_register_nodes(imx_provider, nodes,
> > nodes_count, settings);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto provider_del;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h
> > b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h index 0ad2c654c222..1da87cfe27da
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h
> > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx.h
> > @@ -15,6 +15,31 @@
> >
> >  #define IMX_ICC_MAX_LINKS	4
> >
> > +/*
> > + * High throughput priority level in Regulator mode
> > + * Read Priority in Fixed/Limiter mode  */
> > +#define PRIORITY0_SHIFT	0
> > +/*
> > + * Low throughput priority level in Regulator mode
> > + * Write Priority in Fixed/Limiter mode  */
> > +#define PRIORITY1_SHIFT	8
> > +#define PRIORITY_MASK		0x7
> > +
> > +#define PRIORITY_COMP_MARK	BIT(31)	/* Must set */
> > +
> > +#define IMX_NOC_MODE_FIXED	0
> > +#define IMX_NOC_MODE_LIMITER	1
> > +#define IMX_NOC_MODE_BYPASS	2
> > +#define IMX_NOC_MODE_REGULATOR	3
> > +
> > +#define IMX_NOC_PRIO_REG	0x8
> > +#define IMX_NOC_MODE_REG	0xC
> > +#define IMX_NOC_BANDWIDTH_REG	0x10
> > +#define IMX_NOC_SATURATION	0x14
> > +#define IMX_NOC_EXT_CTL_REG	0x18
> > +
> >  struct imx_icc_provider {
> >  	void __iomem *noc_base;
> >  	struct icc_provider provider;
> > @@ -44,6 +69,22 @@ struct imx_icc_node_desc {
> >  	const struct imx_icc_node_adj_desc *adj;  };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * struct imx_icc_noc_setting - Describe an interconnect node
> > setting
> > + * @ignore: indicate whether need apply this setting
> > + * @reg: register offset inside the NoC
> > + * @prio_level: priority level
> > + * @mode: functional mode
> > + * @ext_control: external input control  */ struct
> > +imx_icc_noc_setting {
> > +	bool ignore;
> 
> I don't like this ignore member. Can we get rid of this and make the "don't
> touch" a special mode, like IMX_NOC_MODE_UNCONFIGURED?

I'll address in V3.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Other than those two nitpicks, the patch looks good.
> 
> Regards,
> Lucas
> 
> > +	u32 reg;
> > +	u32 prio_level;
> > +	u32 mode;
> > +	u32 ext_control;
> > +};
> > +
> >  #define DEFINE_BUS_INTERCONNECT(_name, _id, _adj, ...)
> 	\
> >  	{								\
> >  		.id = _id,						\
> > @@ -61,7 +102,8 @@ struct imx_icc_node_desc {
> >
> >  int imx_icc_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >  		     struct imx_icc_node_desc *nodes,
> > -		     int nodes_count);
> > +		     int nodes_count,
> > +		     struct imx_icc_noc_setting *noc_settings);
> >  int imx_icc_unregister(struct platform_device *pdev);
> >
> >  #endif /* __DRIVERS_INTERCONNECT_IMX_H */ diff --git
> > a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c
> > b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c
> > index 1083490bb391..ae797412db96 100644
> > --- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mm.c
> > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static struct imx_icc_node_desc nodes[] = {
> >
> >  static int imx8mm_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> > -	return imx_icc_register(pdev, nodes, ARRAY_SIZE(nodes));
> > +	return imx_icc_register(pdev, nodes, ARRAY_SIZE(nodes), NULL);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int imx8mm_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) diff --git
> > a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c
> > b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c
> > index ad97e55fd4e5..1ce94c5bdd8c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c
> > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mn.c
> > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct imx_icc_node_desc nodes[] = {
> >
> >  static int imx8mn_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> > -	return imx_icc_register(pdev, nodes, ARRAY_SIZE(nodes));
> > +	return imx_icc_register(pdev, nodes, ARRAY_SIZE(nodes), NULL);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int imx8mn_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) diff --git
> > a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c
> > b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c
> > index d7768d3c6d8a..7f00a0511c6e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/interconnect/imx/imx8mq.c
> > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static struct imx_icc_node_desc nodes[] = {
> >
> >  static int imx8mq_icc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> > -	return imx_icc_register(pdev, nodes, ARRAY_SIZE(nodes));
> > +	return imx_icc_register(pdev, nodes, ARRAY_SIZE(nodes), NULL);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int imx8mq_icc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ