lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YsCdSkzSbVz9gnci@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 2 Jul 2022 22:32:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        vneethv@...ux.ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
        gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
        almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com, yury.norov@...il.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] s390/cio: Rename bitmap_size() as idset_bitmap_size()

On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 09:24:24PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 02/07/2022 à 20:54, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 08:29:09PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

...

> > > -		memset(set->bitmap, 0, bitmap_size(num_ssid, num_id));
> > > +		memset(set->bitmap, 0, idset_bitmap_size(num_ssid, num_id));
> > 
> > Why not to use bitmap_zero()?

...

> > > -	memset(set->bitmap, 0xff, bitmap_size(set->num_ssid, set->num_id));
> > > +	memset(set->bitmap, 0xff, idset_bitmap_size(set->num_ssid, set->num_id));
> > 
> > Why not to use bitmap_fill() ?

> For this initial step, I wanted to keep changes as minimal as possible (i.e
> just function renaming)
> 
> In fact, I plan to send a follow-up patch on this file.
> This would remove the newly renamed idset_bitmap_size() function, use the
> bitmap API directly (as you pointed-out) with
> "set->num_ssid * set->num_id" as size.
> 
> It is already done this way in idset_is_empty(), so it would be more
> consistent.
> 
> If the serie needs a v2 (or if required), I can add an additional 5th patch
> for it. Otherwise it will send separatly later.

If you use bitmap APIs as I suggested above as the first patch, the rest will
have less unneeded churn, no?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ