[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSnZwnQZAo5LH1KEbpVYvCtvTVCG4kZR=aV_gxFuU_D12g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2022 12:06:12 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] selftest: Taint kernel when test module loaded
On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 6:33 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 04:47:44PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > Make any kselftest test module (using the kselftest_module framework)
> > taint the kernel with TAINT_TEST on module load.
> >
> > Note that several selftests use kernel modules which are not based on
> > the kselftest_module framework, and so will not automatically taint the
> > kernel.
> >
> > This can be done in two ways:
> > - Moving the module to the tools/testing directory. All modules under
> > this directory will taint the kernel.
> > - Adding the 'test' module property with:
> > MODULE_INFO(test, "Y")
>
> This just needs to be documented somewhere other than a commit log.
> Otherwise I am not sure how we can be sure it will catch on.
I've updated the kselftest documentation for v5.
> > Similarly, selftests which do not load modules into the kernel generally
> > should not taint the kernel (or possibly should only do so on failure),
> > as it's assumed that testing from user-space should be safe. Regardless,
> > they can write to /proc/sys/kernel/tainted if required.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
>
> Looks good otherwise!
>
> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
>
> Do we want this to go through selftest / kunit / modules tree?
> Happy for it to through any. I can't predict a conflict.
I don't mind which tree it goes through either -- I'm not aware of
anything which would depend on it. I do have it on the list of things
pending for the KUnit tree, but it's much less KUnit-specific now
compared to v1. Regardless, I'll leave in the KUnit to-do list, and
we'll pick it up if no-one else particularly wants to.
Cheers,
-- David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists