lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 21:24:03 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
Cc:     willy@...radead.org, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, arnd@...db.de,
        21cnbao@...il.com, corbet@....net, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        david@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, hagen@...u.net,
        jack@...e.cz, keescook@...omium.org, kirill@...temov.name,
        kucharsk@...il.com, linkinjeon@...nel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, longpeng2@...wei.com, luto@...nel.org,
        markhemm@...glemail.com, pcc@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
        sieberf@...zon.com, sjpark@...zon.de, surenb@...gle.com,
        tst@...oebel-theuer.de, yzaikin@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add support for shared PTEs across processes

On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 16:53:51 -0600 Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com> wrote:

> This patch series implements a mechanism in kernel to allow
> userspace processes to opt into sharing PTEs. It adds a new
> in-memory filesystem - msharefs. 

Dumb question: why do we need a new filesystem for this?  Is it not
feasible to permit PTE sharing for mmaps of tmpfs/xfs/ext4/etc files?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ