[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9A004C03-250B-46C5-BF39-782D7551B00E@tencent.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2022 05:43:19 +0000
From: haibinzhang(张海斌) <haibinzhang@...cent.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@....com>,
Martin Ma <Martin.Ma@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hewenliang4@...wei.com" <hewenliang4@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] arm64: fix oops in concurrently setting insn_emulation
sysctls
How to reproduce:
launch two shell executions:
#!/bin/bash
while [ 1 ];
do
echo 1 > /proc/sys/abi/swp
done
Oops info:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010
Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] SMP
Call trace:
update_insn_emulation_mode+0xc0/0x148
emulation_proc_handler+0x64/0xb8
proc_sys_call_handler+0x9c/0xf8
proc_sys_write+0x18/0x20
__vfs_write+0x20/0x48
vfs_write+0xe4/0x1d0
ksys_write+0x70/0xf8
__arm64_sys_write+0x20/0x28
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x1c0
el0_svc_handler+0x2c/0xa0
el0_svc+0x8/0x200
emulation_proc_handler changes table->data for proc_dointvec_minmax
and so it isn't allowed to reenter before restoring table->data,
which isn't right now.
To fix this issue, keep the table->data as &insn->current_mode and
use container_of() to retrieve the insn pointer. Another mutex is
used to protect against the current_mode update but not for retrieving
insn_emulation as table->data is no longer changing.
Signed-off-by: hewenliang <hewenliang4@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibin Zhang <haibinzhang@...cent.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
index 6875a16b09d2..fb0e7c7b2e20 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct insn_emulation {
static LIST_HEAD(insn_emulation);
static int nr_insn_emulated __initdata;
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(insn_emulation_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(insn_emulation_mutex);
static void register_emulation_hooks(struct insn_emulation_ops *ops)
{
@@ -207,10 +208,10 @@ static int emulation_proc_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
loff_t *ppos)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct insn_emulation *insn = (struct insn_emulation *) table->data;
+ struct insn_emulation *insn = container_of(table->data, struct insn_emulation, current_mode);
enum insn_emulation_mode prev_mode = insn->current_mode;
- table->data = &insn->current_mode;
+ mutex_lock(&insn_emulation_mutex);
ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
if (ret || !write || prev_mode == insn->current_mode)
@@ -223,7 +224,7 @@ static int emulation_proc_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
update_insn_emulation_mode(insn, INSN_UNDEF);
}
ret:
- table->data = insn;
+ mutex_unlock(&insn_emulation_mutex);
return ret;
}
@@ -247,7 +248,7 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation_sysctl(void)
sysctl->maxlen = sizeof(int);
sysctl->procname = insn->ops->name;
- sysctl->data = insn;
+ sysctl->data = &insn->current_mode;
sysctl->extra1 = &insn->min;
sysctl->extra2 = &insn->max;
sysctl->proc_handler = emulation_proc_handler;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists