[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D42FBBDC-A6BA-4374-A726-061A4478D4C7@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 12:14:48 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
CC: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.linux@...il.com>,
"Gross, Andy" <agross@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Fix issues in yaml bindings
On 2 July 2022 01:06:48 GMT+03:00, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 4:01 PM Bhupesh Sharma
><bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Rob pointed some remaining issues in the sdhci-msm yaml
>> bindings (via [1]).
>>
>> Fix the same by first using the 'mmc-controller.yaml' as
>> 'ref' and thereafter also fix the issues reported by
>> 'make dtbs_check' check.
>>
>> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/YnLmNCwNfoqZln12@robh.at.kernel.org/
>>
>> Fixes: a45537723f4b ("dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Convert bindings to yaml")
>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> -> This patch uses the dts changes sent (here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220514215424.1007718-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org/), for fixing the dtbs_check errors.
>> -> This patch is rebased on 'linux-next/master'
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml | 52 ++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>There's another issue with this applied:
>
>Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.example.dtb:
>mmc@...4000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed
>('operating-points-v2' was unexpected)
>
>Should just need a 'operating-points-v2: true' line.
>
>This won't show up until a fix for 'unevaluatedProperties' handling is
>applied. But first I need all the issues fixed.
Could you please add a dt-validate (?) argument so that we can validate new schemas with unevaluatedProperties working as expected, while keeping default behaviour intact (while it gets sorted out)?
>
>Rob
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists