linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Improve Raid5 Lock Contention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YsFKiBSzQWkh2qAu@infradead.org>
Date:   Sun, 3 Jul 2022 00:51:36 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
        David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Improve Raid5 Lock Contention

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 09:48:02PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > Now that I've done some cleanup of the mdadm testing infrastructure
> > as well as a lot of long run testing and bug fixes I'm much more
> > confident in the correctness of this series. The previous posting is
> > at [1].
> 
> Applied to md-next. Thanks for the great work!

They still don't seem to have made it to linux-next.