[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220703213103.n3oxmdnlyjsdrty4@awork3.anarazel.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2022 14:31:03 -0700
From: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [perf-tools] Build-error in tools/perf/util/annotate.c with
LLVM-14
Hi,
On 2022-07-03 22:40:22 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> My test-case was to build a Linux v5.19-rc4 plus custom patches
> including your v1 patchset.
> make-line:
>
> /home/dileks/bin/perf stat make V=1 -j4 LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1
> PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole LOCALVERSION=-1-amd64-clang
> 14-lto KBUILD_BUILD_HOST=iniza KBUILD_BUILD_USER=sedat.dilek@...il.com
> KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP=2022-07-03 bindeb-pkg
> KDEB_PKGVERSION=5.19.0~rc4-1~bookworm+dileks1
> [...]
> Hmmm, it took a bit longer as usual.
I don't think the patches would affect the performance of this workload - I
don't know the kernel build process well, but I don't see why anything in it
would trigger bpf programs to be disassembled? I guess the additional three
feature tests can take a tiny bit of time, but...
Sent out a new version, did add you as a CC.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Powered by blists - more mailing lists