[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220703003434.GA1382015@Peter>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2022 08:34:34 +0800
From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>
To: Piyush Mehta <piyush.mehta@...inx.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, michal.simek@...inx.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
git@...inx.com, sivadur@...inx.com, radheys@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: chipidea: Add support for VBUS control with PHY
On 22-05-24 17:38:02, Piyush Mehta wrote:
> Some platforms make use of VBUS control over PHY which means controller
> driver has to access PHY registers to turn on/off VBUS line.This patch
> adds support for such platforms in chipidea.
>
> Flag 'CI_HDRC_PHY_VBUS_CONTROL' added to support VBus control feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piyush Mehta <piyush.mehta@...inx.com>
> ---
> We have created this patch as RFC, as I introduced a new flag
> (CI_HDRC_PHY_VBUS_CONTROL) and would like to get comment if
> it's the proper way to check for VBus support for zynq.
> ---
> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_usb2.c | 1 +
> drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/usb/chipidea/otg_fsm.c | 7 +++++++
> include/linux/usb/chipidea.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_usb2.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_usb2.c
> index 89e1d82..dc86b12 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_usb2.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_usb2.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static const struct ci_hdrc_platform_data ci_default_pdata = {
>
> static const struct ci_hdrc_platform_data ci_zynq_pdata = {
> .capoffset = DEF_CAPOFFSET,
> + .flags = CI_HDRC_PHY_VBUS_CONTROL,
> };
>
> static const struct ci_hdrc_platform_data ci_zevio_pdata = {
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c
> index bdc3885..bc3634a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/host.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,13 @@ static int ehci_ci_portpower(struct usb_hcd *hcd, int portnum, bool enable)
> priv->enabled = enable;
> }
>
> + if (ci->platdata->flags & CI_HDRC_PHY_VBUS_CONTROL) {
> + if (enable)
> + usb_phy_vbus_on(ci->usb_phy);
> + else
> + usb_phy_vbus_off(ci->usb_phy);
> + }
> +
> if (enable && (ci->platdata->phy_mode == USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_HSIC)) {
> /*
> * Marvell 28nm HSIC PHY requires forcing the port to HS mode.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/otg_fsm.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/otg_fsm.c
> index 6ed4b00..5ed9164 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/otg_fsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/otg_fsm.c
> @@ -471,6 +471,10 @@ static void ci_otg_drv_vbus(struct otg_fsm *fsm, int on)
> return;
> }
> }
> +
> + if (ci->platdata->flags & CI_HDRC_PHY_VBUS_CONTROL)
> + usb_phy_vbus_on(ci->usb_phy);
> +
> /* Disable data pulse irq */
> hw_write_otgsc(ci, OTGSC_DPIE, 0);
>
> @@ -480,6 +484,9 @@ static void ci_otg_drv_vbus(struct otg_fsm *fsm, int on)
> if (ci->platdata->reg_vbus)
> regulator_disable(ci->platdata->reg_vbus);
>
> + if (ci->platdata->flags & CI_HDRC_PHY_VBUS_CONTROL)
> + usb_phy_vbus_off(ci->usb_phy);
> +
Have your platform used OTG FSM? If not used, do not need to change it.
Otherwise, it is okay for me.
Peter
> fsm->a_bus_drop = 1;
> fsm->a_bus_req = 0;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/chipidea.h b/include/linux/usb/chipidea.h
> index edf3342..ee38835 100644
> --- a/include/linux/usb/chipidea.h
> +++ b/include/linux/usb/chipidea.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct ci_hdrc_platform_data {
> #define CI_HDRC_REQUIRES_ALIGNED_DMA BIT(13)
> #define CI_HDRC_IMX_IS_HSIC BIT(14)
> #define CI_HDRC_PMQOS BIT(15)
> +#define CI_HDRC_PHY_VBUS_CONTROL BIT(16)
> enum usb_dr_mode dr_mode;
> #define CI_HDRC_CONTROLLER_RESET_EVENT 0
> #define CI_HDRC_CONTROLLER_STOPPED_EVENT 1
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Thanks,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists