linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: correct QUP peripheral labels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <165682055970.445910.17601664788092675117.b4-ty@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat,  2 Jul 2022 22:56:47 -0500
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        agross@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: correct QUP peripheral labels

On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 17:30:03 +0200, Robert Marko wrote:
> Current QUP peripheral labels like spi_0 and i2c_0 dont really tell what is
> the exact QUP HW being used as there are actually 6 identical QUP HW blocks
> for UART, SPI and I2C.
> For example current i2c_0 label actually points to the QUP2 I2C HW.
> 
> This style of labeling does not follow what the rest of Qualcomm SoC-s use,
> for example IPQ8074 which has the identical QUP blocks.
> It also makes it really hard to add the missing QUP DT nodes as there are
> multiple missing.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: correct QUP peripheral labels
      commit: f82c48d468521cd9d1a31797c6f9e6cac6f7c1b3

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>