linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: madera: Replace kernel.h with the necessary inclusions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YsMUPXoy4LrW1IHj@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jul 2022 17:24:29 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: madera: Replace kernel.h with the necessary
 inclusions

On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 05:51:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> I found that there are files that are related to the sound/soc/* one
> way or another, but listed only in a certain record of MAINTAINERS
> without being listed as part of ASoC record. Does it mean I have to
> always remember to add ASoC maintainers to each patch that touches one
> of such files and doesn't provide them? OR do we need to fix
> MAINTAINERS for such files by listing them in the ASoC record?

Presumably one of those two will be required, yes.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)