[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YsNuMSuneND6KW3o@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 23:48:17 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Linux MM Mailing List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/gup: Add FOLL_INTERRUPTIBLE
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 05:36:53PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> +/*
> + * GUP always responds to fatal signals. When FOLL_INTERRUPTIBLE is
> + * specified, it'll also respond to generic signals. The caller of GUP
> + * that has FOLL_INTERRUPTIBLE should take care of the GUP interruption.
> + */
> +static bool gup_signal_pending(unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + return true;
> +
> + if (!(flags & FOLL_INTERRUPTIBLE))
> + return false;
> +
> + return signal_pending(current);
> +}
This should resemble signal_pending_state() more closely, if indeed not
be a wrapper of signal_pending_state().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists