[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64c753c98488a64b470009e45769ceab29fd8130.camel@linuxfromscratch.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 17:36:31 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...uxfromscratch.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"deller@....de" <deller@....de>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Linux-graphics-maintainer <Linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>,
"kraxel@...hat.com" <kraxel@...hat.com>,
"tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
"daniel.vetter@...ll.ch" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
"lersek@...hat.com" <lersek@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when
removing conflicting FBs
On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 08:46 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Zack,
>
> On 6/17/22 03:35, Zack Rusin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 01:21 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > > On 6/17/22 00:18, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> > > > On 6/16/22 23:03, Zack Rusin wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'll look at this tomorrow but in the meantime, could you please look if the following
> > > > commits on top of drm-misc-next help ?
> > > >
> > > > d258d00fb9c7 fbdev: efifb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather than .remove
> > > > 1b5853dfab7f fbdev: efifb: Fix a use-after-free due early fb_info cleanup
> > > >
> > >
> > > Scratch that. I see in your config now that you are not using efifb but instead
> > > simpledrm: CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM=y, CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB=y and CONFIG_DRM_VMWGFX.
> > >
> > > Since you mentioned efifb I misunderstood that you are using it. Anyways, as
> > > said I'll investigate this tomorrow.
> >
> > Sounds good. Let me know if you'd like me to try it without SIMPLEFB.
> >
>
> Yes, please do. Either with CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB disabled and CONFIG_FB_EFI
> enabled (so that "efi-framebuffer" is registered and efifb probed) or with
> CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB but CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE enabled (so "simple-framebuffer
> is used too but with simplefb instead of simpledrm).
>
> I'm not able to reproduce, it would be useful to have another data point.
Also happening for me with CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB, on a Intel Core i7-
1065G7 (with iGPU).
Reverting this commit on top of 5.19-rc5 "fixes" the issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists