lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 18:05:57 +0800 From: Zhang Jiaming <jiaming@...china.com> To: song@...nel.org Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liqiong@...china.com, renyu@...china.com, Zhang Jiaming <jiaming@...china.com>, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> Subject: [PATCH] block: Fix spelling mistakes in comments Fix spelling of dones't and waitting in comments. Signed-off-by: Zhang Jiaming <jiaming@...china.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> --- drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c index 83c184eddbda..4b799005eb6e 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct r5l_log { * reclaimed. if it's 0, reclaim spaces * used by io_units which are in * IO_UNIT_STRIPE_END state (eg, reclaim - * dones't wait for specific io_unit + * doesn't wait for specific io_unit * switching to IO_UNIT_STRIPE_END * state) */ wait_queue_head_t iounit_wait; @@ -1327,9 +1327,9 @@ static void r5l_write_super_and_discard_space(struct r5l_log *log, * superblock is updated to new log tail. Updating superblock (either * directly call md_update_sb() or depend on md thread) must hold * reconfig mutex. On the other hand, raid5_quiesce is called with - * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waitting - * for all IO finish, hence waitting for reclaim thread, while reclaim - * thread is calling this function and waitting for reconfig mutex. So + * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waiting + * for all IO finish, hence waiting for reclaim thread, while reclaim + * thread is calling this function and waiting for reconfig mutex. So * there is a deadlock. We workaround this issue with a trylock. * FIXME: we could miss discard if we can't take reconfig mutex */ -- 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists