[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d01e993-cc0b-d7e4-b723-560d34524c2f@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 12:32:37 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: qcom: document preferred compatible
naming
On 04/07/2022 12:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Compatibles can come in two formats. Either "vendor,ip-soc" or
> "vendor,soc-ip". Qualcomm bindings were mixing both of usages, so add a
> DT schema file documenting preferred policy and enforcing it for all new
> compatibles, except few existing patterns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Add schema instead of readme (Rob).
>
> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
> Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml | 55 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1af1f16c13ab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/qcom-soc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm SoC compatibles naming convention
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> +
> +description: |
> + Guidelines for new compatibles for SoC blocks/components.
> + When adding new compatibles in new bindings, use the format::
> + qcom,SoC-IP
> +
> + For example::
> + qcom,sdm845-llcc-bwmon
> +
> + When adding new compatibles to existing bindings, use the format in the
> + existing binding, even if it contradicts the above.
> +
> +select:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
> + required:
> + - compatible
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:
> + - description: Preferred naming style for compatibles of SoC components
> + pattern: "^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+.*$"
This pattern should be stricter - followed by '-':
"^qcom,(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcs|sa|sc|sdm|sdx|sm)[0-9]+-.*$"
and additional pattern added for a variant (or maybe few):
"^qcom,msm[0-9]+pro-.*$"
This way also compatibles like "qcom,sdm630whatever" will be caught.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists