[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a4be6a8-6833-f049-3fef-48285a9fe40b@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 13:35:20 +0200
From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, nrb@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390/hwcaps: Add HWCAP_UV
On 7/4/22 12:00, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 12:10:18PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
[ snip ]
>> Any preference from your side?
>
> I mentioned already before this RFC that my preferred solution would
> be to have a solution which extends the existing method to work (also)
> with facility bits - haven't checked if all existing users could be
> converted to facility bits, but making it more flexible would work
> certainly.
>
> If Steffen is willing to do that, that would be very welcome.
> Otherwise I'll put that on my todo list.
I'll have a look on that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists