linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ipq8074: move ARMv8 timer out of SoC node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOX2RU7pm1tc=nAVNk9QB0=SeWoTNFgOsyMPbOPbAV762KvARA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jul 2022 14:35:12 +0200
From:   Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ipq8074: move ARMv8 timer out of SoC node

On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 14:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/07/2022 13:32, Robert Marko wrote:
> > The ARM timer is usually considered not part of SoC node, just like
> > other ARM designed blocks (PMU, PSCI).  This fixes dtbs_check warning:
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8072-ax9000.dtb: soc: timer: {'compatible': ['arm,armv8-timer'], 'interrupts': [[1, 2, 3848], [1, 3, 3848], [1, 4, 3848], [1, 1, 3848]]} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
> >       From schema: dtschema/schemas/simple-bus.yaml
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi | 16 ++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
>
> This is a duplicate, I guess... I responded to newer patch.

Yeah, git-send mail failed the first time so I resent but it actually
succeeded the first time as well.

Sorry for the confusion.

Regards,
Robert
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof