[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a57677268ac356a006ee35f73ceacdf49ae4221.camel@foss.st.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 14:53:36 +0200
From: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...s.st.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Don't return error on missing optional
irq_request_resources()
On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 18:05 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> Function irq_chip::irq_request_resources() is reported as optional
> in the declaration of struct irq_chip.
> If the parent irq_chip does not implement it, we should ignore it
> and return.
>
> Don't return error if the functions is missing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...s.st.com>
> ---
>
> As follow-up of discussion in
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/875ymd6xdu.wl-maz@kernel.org/
> here is a proposal for changing the returned value.
>
> A similar issue is present for the optional function
> irq_set_vcpu_affinity(), to be covered separately, if needed.
Gentle ping for this patch.
Does it match the expected behaviour for an optional function?
Thanks,
Antonio
>
> ---
> kernel/irq/chip.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index 54af0deb239b..eb921485930f 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -1513,7 +1513,8 @@ int irq_chip_request_resources_parent(struct
> irq_data *data)
> if (data->chip->irq_request_resources)
> return data->chip->irq_request_resources(data);
>
> - return -ENOSYS;
> + /* no error on missing optional
> irq_chip::irq_request_resources */
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_chip_request_resources_parent);
>
>
> base-commit: c5eb0a61238dd6faf37f58c9ce61c9980aaffd7a
Powered by blists - more mailing lists